乡村环保内生动力的演变及其生成逻辑——基于城乡关系的视角

The Evolution and Generative Logic of Endogenous Dynamics in Rural Environmental Protection—From the Perspective of Urban-Rural Relationships

中文关键词:  结构性正位  内生动力  城乡关系  乡村环保

英文关键词:structural re-positioning  endogenous dynamics  urban–rural relationship  rural environmental protection

中文摘要:

      既有研究对乡村环保内生动力的探讨存在“重对策轻脉络”和“重个案轻整体”的局限，难以解释其历史流变与区域差异。历史分析发现，乡村环保内生动力的演变轨迹与城乡关系的结构性变迁深度关联：前者在自然二元状态下表现为朴素的地方性实践，在制度二元结构下体现为服务于国家建设目标的环保关联行动，在二元格局松动后因要素外流而陷入系统性衰退，直至国家系统化地调整城乡关系后才呈现出复苏态势。基于对既有激活路径的审视，本文提出结构性正位这一解释框架，旨在揭示乡村环保内生动力的生成取决于乡村在城乡关系中的合理定位。当前，乡村的结构性正位尚未全面实现，内生动力培育存在显著的区域差异。对此，东部地区应着力防范过度资本化对乡村主体性的侵蚀，中西部地区则需借助外部赋能夯实结构性正位的基础，推动乡村环保内生动力的整体性生长。

英文摘要:

      Existing studies on the endogenous dynamics of rural environmental protection often overemphasizes countermeasures while neglecting contextual and prioritizes case studies over holistic perspective, making it difficult to explain their historical evolution and regional variations. Historical analysis reveals that the evolution of rural environmental protection’s endogenous dynamics is deeply intertwined with the structural transformation in urban-rural relationships: under the natural dualism phase, it manifested as simple localized practices; under institutional dualism, it served as environmentally related actions aligned with national development goals; after the loosening of the dual urban-rural configuration, it entered systemic decline due to factor outflows, until a recovery trend emerged following systematic adjustments in urban-rural relations by the state. Based on a critical review of existing activation pathways, this paper proposes the analytical framework of structural re-positioning, aiming to reveal that the generation of rural environmental protection’s endogenous dynamics depends on the rational positioning of rural areas within urban-rural relationships. At present, the comprehensive realization of structural repositioning in rural areas has not been achieved, leading to significant regional disparities in the cultivation of endogenous dynamics. Accordingly, eastern regions should focus on preventing the erosion of rural subjectivity by excessive capitalization, while central and western regions need to consolidate the foundation for re-positioning through external empowerment, so as to promote the holistic growth of rural environmental protection’s endogenous dynamics.